Say “Yes” to More Taxes

7 June 2012

Say “Yes” to Obama’s Green Jobs


See also “Porta-Potties to Antiques: The Curious Journey of Obama’s ‘Green Jobs’”, by Bridget Johnson.
posted by Say Yes to Stupidity at 22:21
labels: American politics, Bridget Johnson, green jobs, orthodoxy, Oversight and Government Reform, piety, PJ Media

No comments:

Post a Comment

Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
“The arrogance of global warming activists and their fellow travellers in politics is something I know well from the past. They wish to suppress truth, control the market, and dictate policy; and I, who have spent most of my time living under communism, feel obliged to warn against it.”—Dr. Václav Klaus
  • ▼  2012 (3)
    • ▼  June (1)
      • Say “Yes” to Obama’s Green Jobs
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2011 (26)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (15)
  • ►  2010 (1)
    • ►  July (1)
4 Corners a carbon dioxide tax AAP ABC Adelaide Now Adeliade Now AGW Alena Composta Alstom American politics Andrew Darby Andrew Demetriou Andrew Wilkie Ann McElhinney ATIA Australian Government Australian Greens avicide Bob Brown Bridget Johnson carbon dioxide Cate Blanchett Catherine Hockley censorship Christian Today Australia Christine Milne Christmas Island Clare Martin Clayton Hinds climate change Congregatio de Propaganda Fide David Gardner David Paris defamation deviation dodgy polls Economic Freedom extortion Frank Lowy freedom is slavery gaming reform Gemma Jones GetUp golden eagle Great Barrier Reef green jobs halal heresy hypocrisy ignore Climategate II indoctrination international Climate Science Coalition Joanne Nova John Connor John Dodd Julia Gillard Kate Osborne et al. Koch Family lie of 97% consensus lies Mark Latham Mark Riley Michael Caton Michelle Fields Michelle Grattan Migration Act 1958 National Press Club New Kerala Not Evil Just Wrong orthodoxy Ove Hoegh-Guldberg Oversight and Government Reform Pascal’s Wager piety PJ Media polls put your money where your mouth is refugees rich fatheads who say they ought to pay more tax but won’t Sarah Hanson-Young Say Yes Australia say “yes” to higher taxes schools sharia law Simon Benson Sky News steam suicide supporting an incompetent government whatever it does Sydney Morning Herald The Age The Climate Institute The Daily Caller The Daily Mail The Daily Telegraph the Duke of Windsor The Greens the logical thing to do The Lowy Institute the Tizona Group Thomas Fink Tom Arup Tom Harris Tony Abbott topical verse tortured metaphors tropes United Nations Vote for Her for She’s a Woman wedge-tailed eagle wind-turbines “asylum-seekers” “carbon pollution”
Tweet
  • small dead animals
    It's Probably Nothing
    17 minutes ago
  • Watts up with That?
    Stop global warming, get paid $12-13 per hour
    44 minutes ago
  • JoNova: Science, carbon, climate and tax
    Amazon River produces monster levels of “pollution”. The dilemma. Should we stop the river?
    1 hour ago
  • Bookworm Room
    Some random factoids about Lois Lerner, the gal who was the head of the IRS exempt organization’s division
    2 hours ago
  • Australian Climate Madness
    Lewandowsky invents new pseudo-science of psycho-climatology™
    4 hours ago
  • Bishop Hill
    Lateral thinking
    4 hours ago
  • Day by Day Cartoon by Chris Muir
    05/22/2013
    4 hours ago
  • Louis Hissink’s Crazy World
    The Oaklahoma Tornado – May 2013 – some thoughts
    5 hours ago
  • Impact of Climate Change
    John Cook et Alii Willfully Lie
    6 hours ago
  • Jihad Watch
    Fort Hood jihad mass murderer has been paid $278,000 while awaiting trial
    7 hours ago
  • Climategate
    Can Tornadoes Be Prevented By Stealing Taxpayer Money To Fund Green Energy Scams?
    10 hours ago
  • Lowering the Bar
    Accused Mustard Vandal and Dog-Puncher Grabs a Couple of Brews During Pursuit
    10 hours ago
  • Climate Resistance
    The Lewandowsky Papers
    10 hours ago
  • Bunyipitude
    You've done it again, McGeough!
    11 hours ago
  • The Climate Sceptics (TCS) Blog
    Wind Power Sucks Subsidies Instead of Turning Turbines
    11 hours ago
  • Had Enough Therapy?
    Reputation's Reputation
    11 hours ago
  • Brendan O’Neill
    Beware the calls to genderbend it like Beckham
    13 hours ago
  • Warning Signs
    Mother Nature's Message to Mankind
    13 hours ago
  • No Frakking Consensus
    Recent Press Releases
    14 hours ago
  • CO2 Science
    The Plight of the Planet's Marine Life: Impacts of UVB Radiation
    14 hours ago
  • SPPI
    Spinning the Climate, The Intergovernmental Pannel on Climate Change (IPCC)
    1 day ago
  • Hope n' Change Cartoons
    Call To Inaction
    1 day ago
  • ABC News Watch
    Missing News: That climate sensitivity thing again
    2 days ago
  • Shub Niggurath Climate
    The Consensus Project
    2 days ago
  • The View from Here
    Wastelandia: Andrew Weaver et al‘s big green choru$ and $ymphony … in the key of Gore
    2 days ago
  • all right, all right
    Labor’s Last-Ditch Lament
    3 days ago
  • Potemkin’s Village
    No legacy is so rich as honesty - William Shakespeare
    3 days ago
  • The Friends of Carbon Dioxide
    Twenty Facts
    3 days ago
  • Disrupt the Narrative
    Obama Thuggery and the Suppression of Opposition? Not an Isolated Incident.
    4 days ago
  • Caroline Glick
    Obama and the "Official Truth"
    4 days ago
  • Pointman
    Working together.
    5 days ago
  • Errors in IPCC climate science
    Snow in UK and downunder on 15th of May
    6 days ago
  • Dr. Tim Ball
    Climate Science As A Vehicle For Political Control
    2 weeks ago
  • Rogue Operator
    Whistleblowers: Hillary Clinton Did Not Convene Counter-Terrorism Group During Benghazi
    2 weeks ago
  • Head Noises
    A New DarwinCatholic!
    2 weeks ago
  • Lytro Blog
    New Lytro Photography Contest and Sweepstakes
    2 weeks ago
  • EU Referendum
    Local politics: a question of democracy
    3 weeks ago
  • Climate Realists
    ClimateRealists.com Site Announcement
    5 weeks ago
  • The Tizona Group
    In which I amuse myself at a government ministers expense.
    1 month ago
  • An Honest Climate Debate
    Global Warming Proof: Expansion of Antarctic sea ice
    1 month ago
  • James Board
    Labor faces annihilation in marginal seats
    1 month ago
  • Save Free Speech
    Reflections on a World Gone Mad, Part 3
    1 month ago
  • The Progressive Contrarian
    Cyprus Needs To Quit
    2 months ago
  • Right Handed Cartoons
    Black Smoke Signals
    2 months ago
  • Climate Nonconformist
    A way to end the global warming debate forever
    2 months ago
  • Maurizio – Omnologos
    Note dal dibattito al King’s College con il Sen. Fantetti e altri candidati per l’Europa alle Elezioni italiane 2013
    3 months ago
  • The Pompous Git
    Windows 7 Sound Recording Using Goldwave and Power Mixer
    11 months ago
  • ♆ The Macho Response ♆
    Kids These Days (You Never Know What They Get Into,…)
    1 year ago
  • Fifty-Two Songs in 2012
    Song 02 – “Angry Shark Blues”
    1 year ago
  • the Trichotomy of Politics
    Flannery’s Bias
    1 year ago
  • Classical Values
  • Panic on a Plate
  • All Right, All Right: a survey on a “price on carbon”
  • Australian Climate Madness: which would you believe?
  • The Beatles Rarity: the best and the worst of The Beatles.
  • Merv Bendle: “Eco-Fascism and the Greens”
  • Christopher Booker: “Proof that the Government Is Tilting at Windmills”
  • Blue-Ringed Octopus, “Welfare Blues”
  • Robert Blumen, “Must We Do Something, Anything, about Global Warming?
  • A.F. Branco, “Shepherding US Decline”
  • Martin Durkin: “The Secret of Global Warming – Posh Anti-Capitalism”
  • The Global Warming Policy Foundation: false alarms
  • The Galactic Empire Times: Obi-Wan Kenobi Is Killed, Vader Says
  • Clive James: “The Drumming of an Army”
  • Cole Jeffrey: “Climate Change Paradox – Current CO2 Levels Are Not of Anthropogenic Origins”
  • David Kaiser: “Physics and Pixie Dust”
  • John McLean, “Prejudiced Authors, Prejudiced Findings”
  • Nicolas Nierenberg
  • NIPCC: “Global Warming and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation”
  • No Frakking Consensus: how much harm to humans is OK?
  • Not Evil Just Wrong: the cost of global warming hysteria.
  • Numberwatch: a complete list of things caused by global warming.
  • Popular Technology.net: Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Scepticism of “Man-Made” Global Warming
  • Matt Ridley, “Inconvenient Truths about Renewable Energy”
  • Pat Sajak: the Solution to Man-made Global Warming.
  • Rocket Scientist’s Journal
  • Spiked: humanity is under-rated.
  • TWAKI: the gutless, brainless bullies of climate alarmism
  • YouTube: Gillard the Liar, “No ‘Carbon’ Tax”
  • Home
  • Say “Yes” to Big Oil
  • Say “Yes” to Crazy Eyes
  • Say “Yes” to the Jedi Mindtrick
  • Say “Yes” to Junk Science
  • Say “Yes” to Safe Wind-Turbines
free counters
Sparkline

The Sydney Morning Herald has a poll: “Do you believe that man’s activities are affecting the world’s climate?” The available answers are only “Yes” or “No”. Is the poll deliberately stupid?

Would you support a tax on carbon dioxide?

If you believe that there should be a tax on carbon dioxide so urgently, why don’t you voluntarily pay more tax now?

Anthropogenic Global Warming: a crippled conjecture
Just as intelligent design is a threshold question between non-science and conjectures, anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is a threshold question between conjectures and hypotheses. AGW is a centuries-old conjecture elevated to an established belief by a little clique of quacks who proclaim themselves the Consensus on Climate, guardians of the vault of exclusive knowledge. Does this sound familiar? Is the Consensus patterned after the Council of Trent? As a matter of science, as opposed to a matter of belief, the AGW conjecture is gathering more contradictory evidence than supporting. The layman can test it and understand its failings by applying just the few principles outlined [earlier in the article].
AGW fails the test because it is proclaimed by a consensus. Science places no value on such a vote. A unanimous opinion, much less a consensus, is insufficient. Science advances one scientist at a time, and we honor their names. It advances one model at a time. When the article gets around to saying “most scientists believe…,” it’s time to go back to the comics section. Science relies instead on models that make factual predictions that are or might be validated.
AGW fails on the first order scientific principles outlined [earlier] because it does not fit all the data. The consensus relies on models initialized after the start of the Industrial era, which then try to trace out a future climate. Science demands that a climate model reproduce the climate data first. These models don’t fit the first-, second-, or third-order events that characterize the history of Earth’s climate. They don’t reproduce the Ice Ages, the Glacial epochs, or even the rather recent Little Ice Age. The models don’t even have characteristics similar to these profound events, much less have the timing right. Since the start of the Industrial era, Earth has been warming in recovery from these three events. The consensus initializes its models to be in equilibrium, not warming. [...]
Anthropogenic Global Warming is a crippled conjecture, doomed just by these principles of science never to advance to a hypothesis. Its fate would be sealed by a minimally scientifically literate public.
—Jeff Glassman, “Conjecture, Hypothesis, Theory, Law: the Basis of Rational Argument”, in The Crossfit Journal 64 (December, 2007).
© 2010 – 2012. Simple template. Template images by imacon. Powered by Blogger.