Say “Yes” to More Taxes: Say “Yes” to Crazy Eyes

Say “Yes” to Crazy Eyes

“The arrogance of global warming activists and their fellow travellers in politics is something I know well from the past. They wish to suppress truth, control the market, and dictate policy; and I, who have spent most of my time living under communism, feel obliged to warn against it.”—Dr. Václav Klaus

▼ 2012 (3)
- ▼ June (1)
  - Say “Yes” to Obama’s Green Jobs
- ► March (1)
- ► February (1)

► 2011 (26)
- ► December (2)
- ► November (1)
- ► September (1)
- ► July (7)
- ► June (15)

► 2010 (1)
- ► July (1)

“asylum-seekers” “carbon pollution” 4 Corners a carbon dioxide tax AAP ABC Adelaide Now Adeliade Now AGW Alena Composta Alstom American politics Andrew Darby Andrew Demetriou Andrew Wilkie Ann McElhinney ATIA Australian Government Australian Greens avicide Bob Brown Bridget Johnson carbon dioxide Cate Blanchett Catherine Hockley censorship Christian Today Australia Christine Milne Christmas Island Clare Martin Clayton Hinds climate change Congregatio de Propaganda Fide David Gardner David Paris defamation deviation dodgy polls Economic Freedom extortion Frank Lowy freedom is slavery gaming reform Gemma Jones GetUp golden eagle Great Barrier Reef green jobs halal heresy hypocrisy ignore Climategate II indoctrination international Climate Science Coalition Joanne Nova John Connor John Dodd Julia Gillard Kate Osborne et al. Koch Family lie of 97% consensus lies Mark Latham Mark Riley Michael Caton Michelle Fields Michelle Grattan Migration Act 1958 National Press Club New Kerala Not Evil Just Wrong orthodoxy Ove Hoegh-Guldberg Oversight and Government Reform Pascal’s Wager piety PJ Media polls put your money where your mouth is refugees rich fatheads who say they ought to pay more tax but won’t Sarah Hanson-Young say “yes” to higher taxes Say Yes Australia schools sharia law Simon Benson Sky News steam suicide supporting an incompetent government whatever it does Sydney Morning Herald The Age The Climate Institute The Daily Caller The Daily Mail The Daily Telegraph the Duke of Windsor The Greens the logical thing to do The Lowy Institute the Tizona Group Thomas Fink Tom Arup Tom Harris Tony Abbott topical verse tortured metaphors tropes United Nations Vote for Her for She’s a Woman wedge-tailed eagle wind-turbines

Watts up with That?

Carbon Credits Failure: Sachs, Romm, Rockström
1 hour ago
JoNova: Science, carbon, climate and tax

Even the US Democrats don’t want to be seen talking about “climate change”
18 hours ago
Bookworm Room

Bookworm Beat 10/17/25: It’s a mad, mad, mad, mad meme edition!
4 days ago
Climategate

Met Office Deletes Huge Chunks of Historic Temperature Data After Fabrication Claims
1 week ago
Head Noises

For Me and My House-
2 weeks ago
ABC News Watch

ABC Productivity Survey - ABC Reaches NET ZERO
3 weeks ago
Had Enough Therapy?

The Virtue of Community
3 months ago
No Frakking Consensus

What I’ve Been Up To
1 year ago
Errors in IPCC climate science

SOI retraces and No Vote historic huge Aussie verdict against Albo Gov
2 years ago
Australian Climate Madness

Australian State Bans Gas to New Homes
2 years ago
♆ The Macho Response ♆

Hello world!
2 years ago
Pointman

The Last Post
2 years ago
Climate Resistance

Intended consequences: energy price rises & inflation
3 years ago
The Climate Sceptics (TCS) Blog

Real Meat is Green - it Eats Grass
4 years ago
The Pompous Git

Some Thoughts on Medical Ethics
4 years ago
Shub Niggurath Climate

‘…when there is one overwhelming factor, you don’t have to worry the details…’
6 years ago
Bishop Hill

Curiouser and curiouser
6 years ago
all right, all right

Rosebery Film Festival
6 years ago
Save Free Speech

To the Grand Chamber European Court of Human Rights Council of Europe
6 years ago
Dr. Tim Ball

What is the Meaningful 97% in the Climate Debate?
7 years ago
Lytro Blog

To the Cinematic and VR Community, Live Long and Prosper
7 years ago
Potemkin’s Village

In a sort of ghastly simplicity we remove the organ and demand the function. We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful. C.S. Lewis
7 years ago
Impact of Climate Change

Abbott’s Address to the GWPF, “Daring to Doubt”
8 years ago
Hope n' Change Cartoons

History in the Unmaking!
8 years ago
EU Referendum

8 years ago
Brendan O’Neill

In defence of the crowd
8 years ago
Climate Realists

Database Error
9 years ago
The View from Here

UN and Syria: Recipe for action or recycled (“climate change” inaction) disaster distraction?
9 years ago
Lowering the Bar

Insane Clown Posse Wins Appeal
10 years ago
Warning Signs

Obama's Middle East Debacle
10 years ago
The Progressive Contrarian

The May 7th Election Dilemma
10 years ago
small dead animals

"Organic" Is The Latin Word For "Grown In Pig Shit"
10 years ago
Disrupt the Narrative

Sorry I Was Missing for a While. Nasty PC Virus Requiring Geek Intervention Kept Me Out of the Battle. But NOTHING BAD HAPPENED in my Absence.
10 years ago
CO2 Science

Crop Breeding for High Production, Water Use Efficiency & Albedo
11 years ago
The Friends of Carbon Dioxide

The Stupid Anti-Carbon Tax is Gone!
11 years ago
the Trichotomy of Politics

Hannan on the “Right-Wing” Label
11 years ago
Bunyipitude

The Bird has flown
11 years ago
The Tizona Group

In which I amuse myself at a government ministers expense.
12 years ago
An Honest Climate Debate

Global Warming Proof: Expansion of Antarctic sea ice
12 years ago
James Board

Labor faces annihilation in marginal seats
12 years ago
Right Handed Cartoons

Black Smoke Signals
12 years ago
Climate Nonconformist

A way to end the global warming debate forever
12 years ago
Maurizio – Omnologos

Maurizio – Omnologos Is Moving
13 years ago
Fifty-Two Songs in 2012

Song 02 – “Angry Shark Blues”
13 years ago
Rogue Operator

House Republicans Come Through in “Put Up or Shut Up” Time on Spending Bill
13 years ago
Jihad Watch
SPPI
Louis Hissink’s Crazy World
Day by Day Cartoon by Chris Muir
Caroline Glick
Panic on a Plate
Classical Values

All Right, All Right: a survey on a “price on carbon”
Australian Climate Madness: which would you believe?
The Beatles Rarity: the best and the worst of The Beatles.
Merv Bendle: “Eco-Fascism and the Greens”
Christopher Booker: “Proof that the Government Is Tilting at Windmills”
Blue-Ringed Octopus, “Welfare Blues”
Robert Blumen, “Must We Do Something, Anything, about Global Warming?
A.F. Branco, “Shepherding US Decline”
Martin Durkin: “The Secret of Global Warming – Posh Anti-Capitalism”
The Global Warming Policy Foundation: false alarms
The Galactic Empire Times: Obi-Wan Kenobi Is Killed, Vader Says
Clive James: “The Drumming of an Army”
Cole Jeffrey: “Climate Change Paradox – Current CO2 Levels Are Not of Anthropogenic Origins”
David Kaiser: “Physics and Pixie Dust”
John McLean, “Prejudiced Authors, Prejudiced Findings”
Nicolas Nierenberg
NIPCC: “Global Warming and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation”
No Frakking Consensus: how much harm to humans is OK?
Not Evil Just Wrong: the cost of global warming hysteria.
Numberwatch: a complete list of things caused by global warming.
Popular Technology.net: Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Scepticism of “Man-Made” Global Warming
Matt Ridley, “Inconvenient Truths about Renewable Energy”
Pat Sajak: the Solution to Man-made Global Warming.
Rocket Scientist’s Journal
Spiked: humanity is under-rated.
TWAKI: the gutless, brainless bullies of climate alarmism
YouTube: Gillard the Liar, “No ‘Carbon’ Tax”

Home
Say “Yes” to Big Oil
Say “Yes” to Crazy Eyes
Say “Yes” to the Jedi Mindtrick
Say “Yes” to Junk Science
Say “Yes” to Safe Wind-Turbines

The Sydney Morning Herald has a poll: “Do you believe that man’s activities are affecting the world’s climate?” The available answers are only “Yes” or “No”. Is the poll deliberately stupid?

Would you support a tax on carbon dioxide?

If you believe that there should be a tax on carbon dioxide so urgently, why don’t you voluntarily pay more tax now?

Anthropogenic Global Warming: a crippled conjecture
Just as intelligent design is a threshold question between non-science and conjectures, anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is a threshold question between conjectures and hypotheses. AGW is a centuries-old conjecture elevated to an established belief by a little clique of quacks who proclaim themselves the Consensus on Climate, guardians of the vault of exclusive knowledge. Does this sound familiar? Is the Consensus patterned after the Council of Trent? As a matter of science, as opposed to a matter of belief, the AGW conjecture is gathering more contradictory evidence than supporting. The layman can test it and understand its failings by applying just the few principles outlined [earlier in the article].
AGW fails the test because it is proclaimed by a consensus. Science places no value on such a vote. A unanimous opinion, much less a consensus, is insufficient. Science advances one scientist at a time, and we honor their names. It advances one model at a time. When the article gets around to saying “most scientists believe…,” it’s time to go back to the comics section. Science relies instead on models that make factual predictions that are or might be validated.
AGW fails on the first order scientific principles outlined [earlier] because it does not fit all the data. The consensus relies on models initialized after the start of the Industrial era, which then try to trace out a future climate. Science demands that a climate model reproduce the climate data first. These models don’t fit the first-, second-, or third-order events that characterize the history of Earth’s climate. They don’t reproduce the Ice Ages, the Glacial epochs, or even the rather recent Little Ice Age. The models don’t even have characteristics similar to these profound events, much less have the timing right. Since the start of the Industrial era, Earth has been warming in recovery from these three events. The consensus initializes its models to be in equilibrium, not warming. [...]
Anthropogenic Global Warming is a crippled conjecture, doomed just by these principles of science never to advance to a hypothesis. Its fate would be sealed by a minimally scientifically literate public.
—Jeff Glassman, “Conjecture, Hypothesis, Theory, Law: the Basis of Rational Argument”, in The Crossfit Journal 64 (December, 2007).